Skip to content

AI Business Case

Template Download Template

Purpose: Develop a comprehensive business case for AI initiatives in government. Covers strategic alignment, benefits analysis, costs, risks, and implementation planning for approval decision-making.
At a Glance
  • Time to complete: 2-4 weeks (gathering data and stakeholder input)
  • Who should complete: Project lead with finance, technical, and business input
  • Key outputs: Investment request, ROI analysis, risk assessment
  • Tools: ROI Calculator | TCO Calculator

Use the Interactive Tools

The ROI Calculator and TCO Calculator can help you model financial scenarios and generate numbers for sections 5-7 of this template.


Document Control

Field Value
Project Name
Business Case Version 1.0
Author
Date
Status Draft / Under Review / Approved
Approver

Executive Summary

One-Page Overview

Project Name: [Name]

Investment Request: $[Amount]

Business Problem: [2-3 sentences describing the problem this AI initiative will solve]

Proposed Solution: [2-3 sentences describing the AI solution]

Key Benefits: | Benefit | Annual Value | |---------|--------------| | [Benefit 1] | $[Amount] | | [Benefit 2] | $[Amount] | | [Benefit 3] | \([Amount] | | **Total Annual Benefit** | **\)[Amount]** |

Investment Summary: | Item | Amount | |------|--------| | Initial Investment | $[Amount] | | Annual Operating Cost | $[Amount] | | 5-Year Total Cost | $[Amount] |

Key Metrics: | Metric | Value | |--------|-------| | ROI (5-year) | [X]% | | Payback Period | [X] months | | NPV | $[Amount] |

Recommendation: [Approve / Approve with conditions / Defer / Reject]


1. Strategic Context

1.1 Strategic Alignment

Strategic Priority How This Initiative Aligns
[Agency Priority 1]
[Agency Priority 2]
[Government Priority]

1.2 Policy Drivers

Policy/Legislation Relevance
[Relevant policy]
[Relevant legislation]

1.3 Trigger for Change

Why now? - [ ] Existing system end-of-life - [ ] Service demand increasing - [ ] Cost pressures - [ ] Technology opportunity - [ ] Policy/legislative change - [ ] Other: [specify]


2. Problem Definition

2.1 Current State

Description of current situation: [Detailed description of how things work today]

Current Process Flow:

Describe or diagram current process

Current Performance: | Metric | Current Value | Target Value | |--------|---------------|--------------| | Processing time | | | | Error rate | | | | Cost per transaction | | | | Customer satisfaction | | | | Staff utilization | | |

2.2 Problem Statement

The core problem is: [Clear, specific statement of the problem]

This matters because: [Why this problem needs to be solved]

If we don't act: [Consequences of inaction]

2.3 Root Causes

Root Cause Evidence

2.4 Impact of Current State

Quantified impacts: | Impact Area | Current Cost/Impact | Evidence | |-------------|---------------------|----------| | Financial | $[Amount]/year | | | Operational | | | | Customer | | | | Staff | | | | Compliance | | |


3. Options Analysis

3.1 Options Considered

Option 1: Do Nothing (Baseline)

Description: Maintain current state with no changes

Aspect Assessment
Cost $[ongoing costs]
Benefits None (baseline)
Risks [deterioration risks]
Recommendation Baseline for comparison

Option 2: Process Improvement (Non-AI)

Description: [Describe non-AI improvement option]

Aspect Assessment
Initial Cost $[Amount]
Annual Cost $[Amount]
Annual Benefits $[Amount]
Key Risks
Pros
Cons

Description: [Describe AI solution]

Aspect Assessment
Initial Cost $[Amount]
Annual Cost $[Amount]
Annual Benefits $[Amount]
Key Risks
Pros
Cons

Option 4: [Alternative AI Approach]

Description: [Describe alternative]

Aspect Assessment
Initial Cost $[Amount]
Annual Cost $[Amount]
Annual Benefits $[Amount]
Key Risks
Pros
Cons

3.2 Options Comparison

Criterion Weight Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
Strategic fit 20%
Benefits 25%
Cost 20%
Risk 15%
Feasibility 10%
Time to value 10%
Weighted Score 100%

Recommended: Option [X] - [Name]

Rationale: [3-5 sentences explaining why this option is recommended]


4. Proposed AI Solution

4.1 Solution Overview

Solution Description: [Comprehensive description of the proposed AI solution]

AI Approach: | Aspect | Details | |--------|---------| | AI Type | Classification / NLP / Prediction / Other | | Model Approach | Custom build / COTS / Cloud API | | Deployment | On-premise / Cloud / Hybrid | | Integration | [Key systems] |

Future State Process:

Describe or diagram future process with AI

4.2 Scope

In Scope: - [ ] [Capability 1] - [ ] [Capability 2] - [ ] [Capability 3]

Out of Scope: - [ ] [Excluded item 1] - [ ] [Excluded item 2]

Assumptions: | # | Assumption | Impact if Wrong | |---|------------|-----------------| | 1 | | | | 2 | | | | 3 | | |

4.3 Technical Requirements

Requirement Specification
Data sources
Compute requirements
Storage
Integration points
Security classification

5. Benefits Analysis

5.1 Quantified Benefits

Financial Benefits

Benefit Category Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
Efficiency Savings
FTE reduction/reallocation
Processing time reduction
Cost Avoidance
Avoided hires
Error reduction
Revenue/Recovery
Increased throughput
Improved collection
Total Financial Benefits

Benefit Calculation Details

Benefit 1: [Name] | Component | Calculation | |-----------|-------------| | Baseline | | | Improvement % | | | Unit value | | | Annual benefit | |

Benefit 2: [Name] | Component | Calculation | |-----------|-------------| | Baseline | | | Improvement % | | | Unit value | | | Annual benefit | |

5.2 Non-Financial Benefits

Benefit Description Measurement Baseline Target
Service quality
Staff satisfaction
Compliance
Decision quality
Customer experience

5.3 Benefit Realization

Benefit Start Date Full Realization Owner Dependencies

6. Cost Analysis

6.1 Cost Summary

Initial Costs (Capital)

Cost Category Amount Assumptions
Discovery & Planning
Requirements analysis
Data assessment
Data Preparation
Data cleansing
Data labeling
Feature engineering
Development
Model development
Integration
Testing
Infrastructure
Hardware/cloud setup
Software licensing
Change Management
Training
Communications
Project Management
PM resources
Governance
Contingency (15%)
TOTAL INITIAL

Ongoing Costs (Annual Operating)

Cost Category Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Infrastructure
Cloud/hosting
Storage
Licensing
Software licenses
API costs
Personnel
Operations support
Data science
Maintenance
Model retraining
System maintenance
Other
Training (ongoing)
Audit/compliance
TOTAL ANNUAL

6.2 Total Cost of Ownership

Year Initial Operating Total Cumulative
Year 0
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
TOTAL

7. Financial Analysis

7.1 Cost-Benefit Summary

Year Costs Benefits Net Benefit Cumulative
Year 0
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
TOTAL

7.2 Key Financial Metrics

Metric Value Interpretation
Total Investment $[Amount] Total cost over 5 years
Total Benefits $[Amount] Total benefits over 5 years
Net Benefit $[Amount] Benefits minus costs
ROI [X]% (Net Benefit / Investment) × 100
Payback Period [X] months Time to recover initial investment
NPV (at 7%) $[Amount] Present value of net benefits
IRR [X]% Internal rate of return
Benefit-Cost Ratio [X]:1 Benefits per dollar invested

7.3 Sensitivity Analysis

Scenario Benefits Costs ROI NPV
Base Case
Benefits -20%
Costs +20%
Delay 6 months
Worst Case

7.4 Break-Even Analysis

Break-even occurs when: [Describe conditions]

Minimum benefits required for positive NPV: $[Amount]/year


8. Risk Assessment

8.1 Key Risks

ID Risk Likelihood Impact Rating Mitigation Owner
R1 Data quality insufficient M H High Data quality assessment; remediation plan
R2 Model accuracy below target M H High POC validation; performance thresholds
R3 Integration complexity M M Medium Architecture review; integration POC
R4 Stakeholder resistance L M Medium Change management; early engagement
R5 Vendor dependency L M Medium Exit clauses; skills transfer
R6 Regulatory/compliance L H Medium Early legal review; compliance checklist
R7 Skills availability M M Medium Training plan; contractor contingency
R8 Budget overrun M M Medium Contingency; stage gates

8.2 AI-Specific Risks

Risk Category Risk Mitigation
Bias & Fairness Model produces unfair outcomes Bias testing; fairness metrics
Explainability Cannot explain decisions Explainability tools; model selection
Data Drift Model degrades over time Monitoring; retraining pipeline
Security AI-specific vulnerabilities Security assessment; controls
Ethics Unintended consequences Ethics review; human oversight

8.3 Risk-Adjusted Analysis

Scenario Probability NPV Weighted NPV
Best case 20%
Base case 60%
Worst case 20%
Expected NPV 100%

9. Implementation Plan

9.1 Delivery Approach

Methodology: Agile / Waterfall / Hybrid

Phasing: | Phase | Description | Duration | Key Deliverables | |-------|-------------|----------|------------------| | Discovery | | | | | Planning | | | | | Design | | | | | Development | | | | | Testing | | | | | Deployment | | | | | Operations | | | |

9.2 Key Milestones

Milestone Target Date Dependencies
Business case approved
Team mobilized
Data prepared
Model developed
Pilot complete
Go-live
Benefits realized

9.3 Resource Requirements

Resource Type Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Ongoing
Project Manager
Business Analyst
Data Scientist
Data Engineer
Developer
Change Manager
SME

9.4 Dependencies

Dependency Owner Status Impact if Not Met

10. Governance & Compliance

10.1 AI Governance

Requirement Approach
Ethics review
Privacy impact assessment
Security assessment
Human oversight
Model documentation

10.2 Compliance Requirements

Requirement Status Evidence
Privacy Act
AI Ethics Framework
PSPF
Agency-specific

10.3 Project Governance

Governance Structure: - Executive Sponsor: [Name] - Project Board: [Members] - Steering Committee: [Frequency]

Decision Rights: | Decision Type | Authority | |---------------|-----------| | Budget changes (<\(X) | Project Manager | | Budget changes (>\)X) | Project Board | | Scope changes | Steering Committee | | Go-live approval | Executive Sponsor |


11. Stakeholder Impact

11.1 Stakeholder Analysis

Stakeholder Impact Interest Engagement Approach
High/Med/Low High/Med/Low

11.2 Change Impact

User Group Nature of Change Impact Level Support Required
High/Med/Low

11.3 Workforce Implications

Implication Details Mitigation
Role changes
Skill requirements
Headcount impact
Union consultation

12. Recommendation

12.1 Summary Assessment

Criterion Assessment
Strategic alignment Strong / Moderate / Weak
Financial return Positive / Marginal / Negative
Risk level Low / Medium / High
Feasibility High / Medium / Low
Timing Urgent / Important / Can defer

12.2 Recommendation

Recommendation: [APPROVE / APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS / DEFER / DO NOT PROCEED]

Conditions (if applicable): 1. [Condition 1] 2. [Condition 2]

Rationale: [2-3 paragraphs explaining the recommendation]

12.3 Next Steps if Approved

Action Owner Timeframe

Appendices

Appendix A: Detailed Cost Breakdown

[Attach detailed cost calculations]

Appendix B: Benefits Calculation Methodology

[Attach detailed benefits calculations]

Appendix C: Technical Architecture

[Attach technical architecture diagrams]

Appendix D: Risk Register

[Attach full risk register]

Appendix E: Stakeholder Register

[Attach stakeholder register]

Appendix F: Supporting Research

[Attach relevant research, benchmarks, case studies]


Sign-Off

Role Name Signature Date
Project Sponsor
Business Owner
Finance
IT
Approving Authority