Skip to content

The Process Tax

Uncomfortable Reading

How Much of Your Project Is Actually Work vs. Proving You Worked?
"We're very busy." Yes. But busy with what?
Process Tax Rates
  • <10%: Healthy - process is serving the work
  • 10-20%: Watch carefully - some fat could be trimmed
  • 20-35%: Warning - process is competing with work
  • >35%: Danger - you're producing process, not outcomes

What Is the Process Tax?

The process tax is the percentage of project effort that goes into:

  • Documentation that no one reads
  • Meetings that don't change outcomes
  • Approvals that are rubber stamps
  • Reporting on progress instead of making progress
  • Compliance activities that don't reduce risk
  • Governance theatre (see: GOVERNANCE_THEATRE.md)

It's the difference between doing the work and proving you did the work.

Some process tax is necessary. Documentation matters. Governance matters. Communication matters.

But there's a point where process stops serving the work and starts replacing it.


The Process Tax Calculator

Step 1: Track Your Time

For one week, categorize every hour:

Category Description Hours
Direct work Actually building, analysing, creating the thing
Useful process Meetings that changed decisions, docs that informed someone
Tax Status reports, unused docs, meetings where you weren't needed
Overhead Admin, email, context switching

Step 2: Calculate Your Rate

Process Tax Rate = (Tax Hours / Total Hours) × 100

Step 3: Interpret

Tax Rate Interpretation
<10% Healthy - process is serving the work
10-20% Watch carefully - some fat could be trimmed
20-35% Warning - process is competing with work
35-50% Danger - process is winning
>50% Crisis - you're producing process, not outcomes

Where the Tax Hides

Status Reporting

Symptoms: - Weekly status report that takes 2 hours to compile - Dashboard that takes 30 minutes to update daily - Multiple reporting lines wanting different formats - Reports no one reads but everyone wants

The tax: - 2-4 hours/week × 52 weeks = 104-208 hours/year - Per person - On a 10-person team: 1000-2000 hours/year - That's a half to full FTE spent on status reporting

The question: Could you deliver this project faster with no status reports but a weekly 30-minute standup instead?


Approvals

Symptoms: - Three signatures needed for decisions within your authority - Approval meetings scheduled 2 weeks out - Approvers who approve everything without reading - Approval dependency chains that create bottlenecks

The tax: - 1 week delay × 10 decisions/project = 10 weeks delay - 2 hours prep per approval × 10 approvals = 20 hours paperwork - Opportunity cost of decisions deferred

The question: Which approvals have ever resulted in "no"? Those are real governance. The rest are tax.


Documentation

Symptoms: - Templates that require 20+ pages - Multiple documents covering the same ground - Documentation required before you know enough to document - Archives of documents never accessed after creation

The tax: - 40-hour business case for a $50k pilot - Risk register maintained quarterly but never consulted - Design documents obsolete before implementation starts

The question: For each document, who read it and what did they do differently because of it?


Meetings

Symptoms: - Standing meetings with no agenda - 10 people in meetings where 3 people talk - Meetings to plan meetings - "For awareness" invitations

The tax: - 1-hour meeting × 10 people = 10 person-hours - Meeting that should have been an email: 10 hours lost - Daily standups that take 45 minutes: 3.75 hours/week × team size

The question: What would happen if we cancelled this meeting? If the answer is "nothing," cancel it.


Governance Forums

Symptoms: - Monthly board that reviews everything superficially - Papers submitted 2 weeks before, decisions made in 5 minutes - Committees with no authority to decide anything - Governance that's bypassed for anything urgent

The tax: - Preparation time for papers: 4-8 hours/paper - Waiting time for decisions: 2-4 weeks - Rework when governance asks questions that should have been asked earlier

The question: When did this governance forum last catch something that would have failed otherwise?


The Compounding Problem

Process tax compounds:

  1. Process creates more process: Governance committees create reporting requirements, which create templates, which create training, which creates more governance.

  2. Process crowds out work: When process takes 50% of time, you hire more people. Those people need process too.

  3. Process becomes identity: People whose job is process will defend and expand process.

  4. Process becomes cover: "We followed the process" becomes an excuse for bad outcomes.

The result: organizations that are very busy producing very little.


The Tax by Project Phase

Typical process tax at each phase:

Phase Healthy Tax Actual Tax (Often) What's Taxing
Discovery 10-15% 30-40% Approval to explore, stakeholder mapping overkill
Planning 20-25% 40-60% Business case theatre, governance approvals
Design 15-20% 30-40% Design documentation, change requests
Build 10-15% 20-30% Status reporting, technical documentation
Test 10-15% 25-35% Test documentation, defect reporting
Deploy 15-20% 40-50% Release approvals, change advisory boards
Operate 10-15% 30-40% Operational reporting, incident documentation

Pattern: The tax is highest where the process was designed by people who don't do the work.


The Hidden Taxes

Things that don't look like process but function as tax:

Context Switching Tax

  • Pulled into 3 different governance meetings for 3 different projects
  • Each switch costs 20-30 minutes of productive time
  • 5 switches/day = 2-2.5 hours lost

Approval Waiting Tax

  • Work that can't proceed until someone approves something
  • Average approval wait: 5 days
  • Productivity during wait: near zero for blocked work

Meeting Recovery Tax

  • Back-to-back meetings with no breaks
  • No time to process or act on meeting outcomes
  • Actions captured but not executed

Perfectionism Tax

  • Document reviewed and edited 5 times
  • Each revision after the second adds minimal value
  • 80% quality in 20% of the time is often enough

Consistency Tax

  • Making this project's documents match previous projects' formats
  • Standardization for its own sake
  • Time spent reformatting vs. rethinking

How to Cut the Tax

Strategy 1: Zero-Base Your Process

Instead of asking "can we remove this?" ask "if we were starting fresh, would we add this?"

Everything should have to justify its existence.

Strategy 2: Time-Box Everything

  • No document >10 pages without explicit justification
  • No meeting >1 hour
  • No approval wait >48 hours for decisions under $X

Strategy 3: Question the Default

When someone says "we need to..." ask: - Who decided that? - What happens if we don't? - When did this rule start, and is the original reason still valid?

Strategy 4: Measure the Tax

Make it visible. Track direct work vs. process time. Report it. Create accountability for keeping tax low.

Strategy 5: Create Fast Paths

  • Pre-approved patterns that don't need re-approval
  • Templates that can be completed in 30 minutes
  • Standing authorities for decisions under certain thresholds

Strategy 6: Kill Unused Process

If a document/meeting/approval hasn't been used in 6 months, eliminate it. See if anyone notices.


The Bureaucracy Budget

Just like a financial budget, set a process budget:

For a Small Project (<$100k, <6 months)

Process Maximum Allocation
Planning documentation 8 hours
Governance meetings 4 hours total
Status reporting 30 mins/week
Approvals 3 total, 48-hour turnaround
Final documentation 8 hours

Total process budget: ~40 hours over life of project

For a Medium Project (\(100k-\)1M, 6-12 months)

Process Maximum Allocation
Business case 16 hours
Planning documentation 24 hours
Governance meetings 2 hours/month
Status reporting 1 hour/week
Risk management 2 hours/month
Approvals Gate reviews only
Final documentation 24 hours

Total process budget: ~150 hours over life of project

For a Large Project (>$1M, >12 months)

Process Maximum Allocation
Business case 40 hours
Planning documentation 60 hours
Governance forums 4 hours/month
Status reporting 2 hours/week
Risk management 4 hours/month
Stakeholder engagement 4 hours/week
Approvals Defined gates
Final documentation 60 hours

Total process budget: ~500 hours over life of project

If you're exceeding these budgets, you're probably over-processing.


The Uncomfortable Math

Consider a $500k project:

Scenario Process Tax Hours on Process Hours on Work Effective Cost
Low tax (15%) $75k 750 4250 $500k
Medium tax (30%) $150k 1500 3500 $500k
High tax (50%) $250k 2500 2500 $500k

With high process tax, half your budget is producing documentation, not outcomes.

That $500k project is delivering $250k of value.

Is your governance worth $250k?


A Final Provocation

What if you:

  • Cut all documentation requirements by 50%
  • Cancelled half your standing meetings
  • Made all approvals 24-hour turnaround or auto-approved
  • Fired the governance committee and made project sponsors directly accountable

Would your projects: a) Succeed more often? b) Fail more often? c) Finish faster regardless?

Be honest about the answer.


"The process is not the product. Never confuse motion with progress."