The Process Tax¶
Uncomfortable Reading
- <10%: Healthy - process is serving the work
- 10-20%: Watch carefully - some fat could be trimmed
- 20-35%: Warning - process is competing with work
- >35%: Danger - you're producing process, not outcomes
What Is the Process Tax?¶
The process tax is the percentage of project effort that goes into:
- Documentation that no one reads
- Meetings that don't change outcomes
- Approvals that are rubber stamps
- Reporting on progress instead of making progress
- Compliance activities that don't reduce risk
- Governance theatre (see: GOVERNANCE_THEATRE.md)
It's the difference between doing the work and proving you did the work.
Some process tax is necessary. Documentation matters. Governance matters. Communication matters.
But there's a point where process stops serving the work and starts replacing it.
The Process Tax Calculator¶
Step 1: Track Your Time¶
For one week, categorize every hour:
| Category | Description | Hours |
|---|---|---|
| Direct work | Actually building, analysing, creating the thing | |
| Useful process | Meetings that changed decisions, docs that informed someone | |
| Tax | Status reports, unused docs, meetings where you weren't needed | |
| Overhead | Admin, email, context switching |
Step 2: Calculate Your Rate¶
Step 3: Interpret¶
| Tax Rate | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| <10% | Healthy - process is serving the work |
| 10-20% | Watch carefully - some fat could be trimmed |
| 20-35% | Warning - process is competing with work |
| 35-50% | Danger - process is winning |
| >50% | Crisis - you're producing process, not outcomes |
Where the Tax Hides¶
Status Reporting¶
Symptoms: - Weekly status report that takes 2 hours to compile - Dashboard that takes 30 minutes to update daily - Multiple reporting lines wanting different formats - Reports no one reads but everyone wants
The tax: - 2-4 hours/week × 52 weeks = 104-208 hours/year - Per person - On a 10-person team: 1000-2000 hours/year - That's a half to full FTE spent on status reporting
The question: Could you deliver this project faster with no status reports but a weekly 30-minute standup instead?
Approvals¶
Symptoms: - Three signatures needed for decisions within your authority - Approval meetings scheduled 2 weeks out - Approvers who approve everything without reading - Approval dependency chains that create bottlenecks
The tax: - 1 week delay × 10 decisions/project = 10 weeks delay - 2 hours prep per approval × 10 approvals = 20 hours paperwork - Opportunity cost of decisions deferred
The question: Which approvals have ever resulted in "no"? Those are real governance. The rest are tax.
Documentation¶
Symptoms: - Templates that require 20+ pages - Multiple documents covering the same ground - Documentation required before you know enough to document - Archives of documents never accessed after creation
The tax: - 40-hour business case for a $50k pilot - Risk register maintained quarterly but never consulted - Design documents obsolete before implementation starts
The question: For each document, who read it and what did they do differently because of it?
Meetings¶
Symptoms: - Standing meetings with no agenda - 10 people in meetings where 3 people talk - Meetings to plan meetings - "For awareness" invitations
The tax: - 1-hour meeting × 10 people = 10 person-hours - Meeting that should have been an email: 10 hours lost - Daily standups that take 45 minutes: 3.75 hours/week × team size
The question: What would happen if we cancelled this meeting? If the answer is "nothing," cancel it.
Governance Forums¶
Symptoms: - Monthly board that reviews everything superficially - Papers submitted 2 weeks before, decisions made in 5 minutes - Committees with no authority to decide anything - Governance that's bypassed for anything urgent
The tax: - Preparation time for papers: 4-8 hours/paper - Waiting time for decisions: 2-4 weeks - Rework when governance asks questions that should have been asked earlier
The question: When did this governance forum last catch something that would have failed otherwise?
The Compounding Problem¶
Process tax compounds:
-
Process creates more process: Governance committees create reporting requirements, which create templates, which create training, which creates more governance.
-
Process crowds out work: When process takes 50% of time, you hire more people. Those people need process too.
-
Process becomes identity: People whose job is process will defend and expand process.
-
Process becomes cover: "We followed the process" becomes an excuse for bad outcomes.
The result: organizations that are very busy producing very little.
The Tax by Project Phase¶
Typical process tax at each phase:
| Phase | Healthy Tax | Actual Tax (Often) | What's Taxing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery | 10-15% | 30-40% | Approval to explore, stakeholder mapping overkill |
| Planning | 20-25% | 40-60% | Business case theatre, governance approvals |
| Design | 15-20% | 30-40% | Design documentation, change requests |
| Build | 10-15% | 20-30% | Status reporting, technical documentation |
| Test | 10-15% | 25-35% | Test documentation, defect reporting |
| Deploy | 15-20% | 40-50% | Release approvals, change advisory boards |
| Operate | 10-15% | 30-40% | Operational reporting, incident documentation |
Pattern: The tax is highest where the process was designed by people who don't do the work.
The Hidden Taxes¶
Things that don't look like process but function as tax:
Context Switching Tax¶
- Pulled into 3 different governance meetings for 3 different projects
- Each switch costs 20-30 minutes of productive time
- 5 switches/day = 2-2.5 hours lost
Approval Waiting Tax¶
- Work that can't proceed until someone approves something
- Average approval wait: 5 days
- Productivity during wait: near zero for blocked work
Meeting Recovery Tax¶
- Back-to-back meetings with no breaks
- No time to process or act on meeting outcomes
- Actions captured but not executed
Perfectionism Tax¶
- Document reviewed and edited 5 times
- Each revision after the second adds minimal value
- 80% quality in 20% of the time is often enough
Consistency Tax¶
- Making this project's documents match previous projects' formats
- Standardization for its own sake
- Time spent reformatting vs. rethinking
How to Cut the Tax¶
Strategy 1: Zero-Base Your Process¶
Instead of asking "can we remove this?" ask "if we were starting fresh, would we add this?"
Everything should have to justify its existence.
Strategy 2: Time-Box Everything¶
- No document >10 pages without explicit justification
- No meeting >1 hour
- No approval wait >48 hours for decisions under $X
Strategy 3: Question the Default¶
When someone says "we need to..." ask: - Who decided that? - What happens if we don't? - When did this rule start, and is the original reason still valid?
Strategy 4: Measure the Tax¶
Make it visible. Track direct work vs. process time. Report it. Create accountability for keeping tax low.
Strategy 5: Create Fast Paths¶
- Pre-approved patterns that don't need re-approval
- Templates that can be completed in 30 minutes
- Standing authorities for decisions under certain thresholds
Strategy 6: Kill Unused Process¶
If a document/meeting/approval hasn't been used in 6 months, eliminate it. See if anyone notices.
The Bureaucracy Budget¶
Just like a financial budget, set a process budget:
For a Small Project (<$100k, <6 months)¶
| Process | Maximum Allocation |
|---|---|
| Planning documentation | 8 hours |
| Governance meetings | 4 hours total |
| Status reporting | 30 mins/week |
| Approvals | 3 total, 48-hour turnaround |
| Final documentation | 8 hours |
Total process budget: ~40 hours over life of project
For a Medium Project (\(100k-\)1M, 6-12 months)¶
| Process | Maximum Allocation |
|---|---|
| Business case | 16 hours |
| Planning documentation | 24 hours |
| Governance meetings | 2 hours/month |
| Status reporting | 1 hour/week |
| Risk management | 2 hours/month |
| Approvals | Gate reviews only |
| Final documentation | 24 hours |
Total process budget: ~150 hours over life of project
For a Large Project (>$1M, >12 months)¶
| Process | Maximum Allocation |
|---|---|
| Business case | 40 hours |
| Planning documentation | 60 hours |
| Governance forums | 4 hours/month |
| Status reporting | 2 hours/week |
| Risk management | 4 hours/month |
| Stakeholder engagement | 4 hours/week |
| Approvals | Defined gates |
| Final documentation | 60 hours |
Total process budget: ~500 hours over life of project
If you're exceeding these budgets, you're probably over-processing.
The Uncomfortable Math¶
Consider a $500k project:
| Scenario | Process Tax | Hours on Process | Hours on Work | Effective Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low tax (15%) | $75k | 750 | 4250 | $500k |
| Medium tax (30%) | $150k | 1500 | 3500 | $500k |
| High tax (50%) | $250k | 2500 | 2500 | $500k |
With high process tax, half your budget is producing documentation, not outcomes.
That $500k project is delivering $250k of value.
Is your governance worth $250k?
A Final Provocation¶
What if you:
- Cut all documentation requirements by 50%
- Cancelled half your standing meetings
- Made all approvals 24-hour turnaround or auto-approved
- Fired the governance committee and made project sponsors directly accountable
Would your projects: a) Succeed more often? b) Fail more often? c) Finish faster regardless?
Be honest about the answer.
"The process is not the product. Never confuse motion with progress."